“Una posibilidad que explicaría nuestras diferencias es que nos estemos refiriendo a dos casos distintos. Usted habla de un proceso en el que documentos y testigos desmintieron todo indicio de fraude. Yo hablo de uno en el que documentos y testigos muestran sustracciones innegables”
Por Ramón Antonio Veras / El Caribe
.
El día de ayer, martes 16 de octubre, se publicó en el periódico El Caribe la primera parte de las precisiones que a solicitud del Lic. Vinicio Castillo Semán, estoy haciendo en torno al caso Baninter.
By submitting this work, also called the direction of this newspaper to request that the contents of my answers were known to the readers and be interested at the time of publication, as they send the basic principles of ethics governing the practice of journalism .
addition to the first part of my work, The Caribbean, also published yesterday in its editorial that read with the greatest satisfaction, the answer to the request I made.
I should note that I have a deep appreciation and utmost respect to the Caribbean for hosting my talk yesterday about the case Baninter, with professionalism and integrity with which he did.
Actually, my misgivings about the handling that occurs in some media to publish information and opinions that did not originate in the Caribbean and I should not bother to executives sharing their hardships with which they are related. With all my heart I apologize to them.
I knew and I'm glad I ratified, this means that there is much difference from others, led by hypocrites whose performance in the media is a monument to the mediocre and cowardly. Continuing
clarifications I requested Mr. Vinicio Castillo, about my position on the case Baninter, to expose what followed for items of 3 to 13 of the 26 he has insisted on trying.
This dissertation hopes to help you remove some unlikely phantasmagoria his convoluted version of events, but when it is over do not understand the above, I am available to repeat and expand.
3 .- Mr. Castillo Week, a chance to explain our differences is that we are referring to two different cases.
You talk about a process that documents and witnesses denied any evidence of fraud. I, however, speak of a process that documents and witnesses to show undeniable and subtractions confirmed and verified, as the money that was removed Baninter funds to buy a yacht worth $ 14 million, and other minutiae.
In the trial that I mentioned, it was proven through documentation, that when one of the houses of the accused needed a pan to fry eggs, the pan was purchased with money from shareholders and depositors of Baninter.
Thus, among likely Le Creuset pans, stoves and microwave ovens and the latest technology, waffle irons, toasters, cappuccino frets to the ones that cost like a car, dishwasher built with materials proposed by NASA , Riedel and Waterford to the wine, lemon squeezers operated with nuclear energy, German knives to peel carrots in the form of roses, pearl spoons for serving caviar, paddlefish for cheeses, handmade and title of 'one' by French craftsmen and silver tea sets nineteenth century, potato masher digital and other utensils and appliances of common use or uses unimaginable, the bank paid RD $ 350,000.00 "Group Electro", if RD $ 60,900.00 a Casa Cuesta, if RD $ 65,000.00 to "import forms", etc.., I I was far from over there.
According to documents filed with the judges, with money from the failed bank also paid the wages of domestic servants, telephone bills, school children, purchase of furniture, home building, remodeling of villas, buying cars and antiques, flowers and table corners, taking care of the grass on the playgrounds, maintenance of SUVs and real estate travel, decorating and even the "vaporuses" and aspirin at the pharmacy.
appeared a note of RD $ 15,988.50 for the Pharmacy Carol and a RD $ 960.00 for the Pharmacy Ricard.
Among individual accounts that were charged to Baninter is a RD $ 737, 333. 25 for an insurance policy to move the yacht "Patricia" from France to Miami and other numbering about RD $ 370, 000.00 to make the iron works to a house in Chavon, a RD $ 248,326.00, for construction of a pier in a house: RD $ 300,000.00 for work landscape in the same private residence as well as RD $ 19,000.00 by curtains, several million for construction a palace and a more ornate so a carnival float in Rio de Janeiro, to speak in metaphors that are familiar to the accused.
all, to add the 55 billion that evaporated from Baninter and now are paying the Dominican people, people who've never tasted caviar and has to pay as if wiped out stocks of Caspian Sea sturgeon.
A people you do not know the fine diamonds and has to pay them as if each of its ten million members have a Hope hooked in the neck. A people who do not have money to buy a painkiller for cancer or how face aids.
A village where children die because of diarrhea due to missing 20 pesos to rehydrate with a serum, a town where every day they go to bed for at least two million people with the desire to find uncertain morrow morning a pan of water to eat. And the people are miserable is the one paying the cornucopias with yachts and villas of their lineage and ancestry thieves.
Before leaving this point I would remind you, as is Remember, the statements in the trial of the former General Manager of Accounting Baninter, Mr. Priam Concepción Rodriguez, when asked regarding the existence or not of Interbanco or hidden bank operating in the Baninter: "Priam Conception: first, for me Interbanco represented another ledger and second, was not in charge of such operations. Lawyer: Don Priam, "inspectors visited the superintendency Baninter? Priam Conception: Yes, right. Lawyer: And they had the chance to see the operations that were in the Interbanco? Priam Concepcion: Not ".
But also, fraudulent means used by the defendants, and believed that would not be discovered, very well were specified by the four international experts who explained the existence and operational performance of Bank Interbanco or concealed: "The mechanism by which concealed the fraud has been called in common usage "parallel bank" or "parallel accounting, and is not nothing but a computer and accounting gimmick to hide from the authorities and the general public a significant part of the bank's operations, which in the case Baninter reached, at the time of his speech, roughly twice the visible part of the bank .... "
Mr. Castillo week, more clear there, or water.
4 .- Mr. Castillo Week, it is true that I suffer from various ailments, but among them is not blindness, which I sometimes doubt if it will be a misfortune or a blessing. I have a keen eye and on top hear more than a physical.
is feared that the blind you are, you do not see the mountain of documents that prove the fraud, cheating and fraud against the Dominican people conducted in the Baninter.
He said the Monetary Authority and Financial proceeded protected by the Constitution and laws, and ratified in the light of the combined provisions of Articles 111, paragraph 3 Constitution of the Republic, as 90 of the Monetary and Financial Law.
If you take the time to read again the quotations you do, on the provisions that I mentioned, maybe fix that you are strengthening my arguments. Put a complaint against his master reading comprehension. I fear that robbed the rooms.
authorities had legal grounds to provide bank intervention and the appointment of the Committee of Directors, given the apparent insolvency state of emergency that was the Baninter and the strong possibility that the bank collapsed, dragging the entire financial system, because we are not talking the sale of the corner, Mr. Castillo week, but the bank according to its own figures, was the largest volume of the country until it exploded like a bladder, for all the pricks who made their executives.
According to the text of the Constitution that you play, the Monetary Board is given the power to regulate the monetary and financial system of the nation that within the capitalist economy in the country, is a key component for its stability .
simply no other economic sector focused, within this political structure, economic and legal, that of banking. In this context, it is clear that the literal a) b) of Art. 2 of the Monetary and Financial Law, to strengthen and further define the above constitutional authority of the Monetary Board have:
a) "regulation monetary system. The regulation of the monetary system will aim to maintain price stability, which is indispensable basis for national economic development.
b) Financial System Regulation. The control system shall be to ensure compliance with the conditions of liquidity, solvency and management that must be met at all times financial intermediaries in accordance with the provisions of this Act, to seek normal operation of the system in an environment of competitiveness, efficiency and free market. "
For the same, reiterating the special and exceptional powers granted to the Monetary and Financial Law itself to the Monetary Board, if there is any conflict between provisions of this rule and any other regulatory provision and its scope derogatory, the final part of Article 90 is clear when it states: "If there is conflict over the extent of the derogation, the Monetary Board to give an opinion ...." In addition
as explicitly set by law, the measures were endorsed and adopted as desirable and even inevitable by international experts consulted you want to side in its attempt to cover the sun with a finger.
These consultations agreed that by April 2003, when the intervention occurred Baninter, there is serious insolvency of the bank that threatened the national financial system, so the action taken was justified, as the designation of that Service Commission.
The first and very well reputed international experts diagnostic consultation says: "The banking crisis that erupted in early 2003 in the Dominican Republic led to the country's authorities to conduct a rescue operation as a way to avoid systemic crisis, which could be triggered by the fraud committed in banks that accounted for much of the system's assets. [...] The Monetary Board 03/04/2007 takes over Baninter activities due to the failure in negotiations for sale or merger, and the complex situation of insolvency and related companies in the Bank observed Baninter . The purpose was appointed an Administrative Commission for the management of assets and liabilities of the same ... ".
then notes:" As for the actions of the authorities in the resolution process, the Panel considers that there were 'situations actually 'own banking crises of great magnitude ... ".
The report concludes by pointing stated categorically that:" On the other hand, the way they spread the upper limit for liquidity facilities delayed the inevitable intervention and liquidation, which increased the costs of solution. "
Another diagnosis, delivered by one of the most experienced consultants worldwide banking crisis, Aristobulus Don Juan, who was in the country before, during and after the date of the decree referred to the intervention, recommended and approved the provision, in order to avoid the 'domino effect' that threatened to drag the entire the financial system.
Baninter The situation, Mr. Castillo week, was a national disaster and had to face as an emergency, even in spite of the numerous accomplices, by omission or commission, that the defendants were in the upper echelons of political power and acted only to delay and ultimately, only when the world began to open them under their feet because of the hole.
Obviously, the client's interest was that the Central Bank continue giving the substantial public resources that gave him and despite the fraud revealed, let him continue to have access to free not only from these resources, but scarce resources of depositors and investors that had not been distracted for their benefit and linked.
is as if the monkey had stopped caring for the bananas and when alarmed by the disproportionate excesses of primate, wanted to withdraw the despeluñado cluster, the destroyer complained because they were spoiled.
0 comments:
Post a Comment